Dishonesty in Hamlet Essay

Many critics have suggested crossroads chronicles the perils of c atomic number 18er within a largely false and dish angiotensin-converting enzymest knowledge domain. To what extent has this been your experience of Shakespeares play?The world we currently know has experienced many stages and eras such as the Renaissance era and the New founding Era. In each of these eras, falsehood, imposture, deceit and revenge all seem to grow rich, until now remorse and guiltiness grow poor. Like a domino effect, with all this tre custodydous falsehood come fatal and unhealthful dangers in life. Whether it be due to the risks of overthinking, or perhaps the risks of taking action, they seem to grow exponentially with time. William Shakespeare portrays evidently this changing world and its forever increasing perils of deceit passim the play small town, representing the moment of fictionalization and its effects on everything most us, specifically the Great Chain of Being and Nature it self.The world the earshot is shown as they enter Hamlet is stuck in a phase between the Renaissance and New domain of a function Era. The men of the Renaissance era were warriors and put trust in themselves, whereas in the New World, more men are thinkers as they have lost a intellect of existential trust. This transition is essentially portrayed in the allusion to the story of the Helen of Troy, recited by Hamlet himself in trifle 2 Scene 2 where Pyrrhus, a son who vows to avenge his dead father, seeks revenge on his murderer, Priam. Pyrrhus goes on to slay Priam, unless before doing so, wish well a neutral to his depart and matter does nothing. However after this pause, he is able to play along through with his mission.Pyrrhus hence portrays a true warrior. Similarly, we see in Act 3 scene 3, Hamlet following in Pyrrhus legacy to avenge his father, however there is a detrimental difference in Hamlets rules. Hamlet, being a thinker from the new world, pauses before strik ing king Claudius, however he does what Pyrrhus would not dare do think. Essentially, Hamlet diversitys what should have occurred, and in turn causes a eruct effect where Polonius, Ophelia, Gertrude, Rosencrantz, etc. all die. This ultimately demonstrates how Shakespeare intends to chronicle how as the world changes and becomes less trusting with ones self, the perils of overthinking life become more and more genuinely and indeed cause the perils of death.All this change in the world and the ever-increasing deceit add up and cause a signifi micklet rupture and remnant of the Great Chain Of Being (GCOB). Where a king should be a descendant of the original king, rather of Hamlet becoming king, Claudius takes his position. Claudius crown is an extensive metaphor for a mask he wears in which it makes himself rule much more evocative and powerful, something he is not. Throughout the entire play, Claudius life is ultimately an existential lie. portrayed through a metaphor used in Hamlets conversation with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in Act 2 Scene 2 that Denmarks a prison, Shakespeare suggests that the city has spiralled into destruction, violence and unlawful sins. likewise with the use of the metaphysical appearances of the ghost of Old Hamlet in multiple scenes, the audience is brought to conclude that the dishonesty of King Claudius has inflicted disruption to each and every person in Denmark. Hamlet tells the story of a real life Machiavel and how his villainous actions cause downfall and havoc to all life in Denmark. Ultimately, the anecdote of King Claudius is used to represent how ones dishonesty to himself, and to everyone around him, create dangers to not only himself, only if to nature and society itself.The idea that lies and deceit cause disturbances to every persons lives is further compound by the use of structure in Hamlet. In almost every scene in which lies are being t senile (such as Act 2 scene 2 where Hamlet insults Polonius with his lies and where Rosencrantz and Guildenstern attempt to lie to Hamlet, and over again in Act 3 Scene 2 where Hamlet teaches the players how to act or, in other words, lie, and so forth) the structure changes from Shakespeares famous iambic pentameter, to structure less speech.This use of transitory structures is Shakespeares method of metaphors to demonstrate that as people become more and more dishonest, they begin to destroy the unadulterated musical harmony of life and how its sequences should play out, pushing it into madness and confusion. Shakespeare attempts to portray to his audience his idea that the more lies and dishonesty, the more the perils of cause death and destroying the true sequence of events that are meant to be followed, falling back on the idea of disturbances of the GCOB.An old myth states that if you keep making faces as the bring up changes, your face will last out that way. Analysing this further, if you wear a mask in many different situations, you so on begin to wear that mask forever. Shakespeare alludes to this myth in Act 2 Scene 2 where Hamlet says he is but mad north-north-west but when the wind is southerly, he knows a hawk from a handsaw. In Act 1 Scene 5, Hamlet states how he will put on an antic disposition, in other words put on a metaphorical mask whenever he is around those he does not trust. Shakespeares allusion to the myth suggests that if Hamlet continues to act like someone he is not, he will remain that way he will remain to be crazy.Essentially, Hamlets dishonesty with himself and with those around him foreshadows his downfall, and, ultimately, his death. By alluding to the myth in one scene, and portraying how Hamlet is indeed wearing this mask as the wind changes in another scene, it can be extracted that Shakespeare intended to show a developing story of the dangers of lying and wearing masks to cover up the truth. If in your own world, you must lie to yourself, and continuously lie and deceive yourself, i ndeed you will remain that way, and henceforth lead on to much more fatal things such as becoming permanently insane.This notion of wearing masks to cover up ones true identity is evident throughout the course of Hamlet. It is again seen where Polonius hides himself behind an arras in Act 3 Scene 4, spying on Hamlet and his mothers conversation. Essentially, Polonius choice to hide behind an arras and lead himself into dishonesty unravels and causes him to be accidentally murdered. The demonstration of the consequences of lying and deceiving is genuinely strong here, where it does not lead to simply madness nor pain, but the worst punishment of our current world death. This irreversible consequence demonstrates the desperation of Shakespeare to get his message crosswise that with lying and dishonesty, there is a chain reaction and it may possibly lead to death, ultimately the greatest peril of life.There is a specific order in which the world works, and when one lies, or deceives t hose around them, indeed they denature the destined sequence of events in life. In doing so they form a sense of confusion and cause even more dishonesty with everyone around them. In conjunction with the above, it is overly simple to conclude that William Shakespeare depicts the ever-increasing dishonesty and deceitfulness throughout Hamlet and in turn successfully and evidently chronicles the consequences and aftermath of these sinful actions.